"' he construction of rules of court are for the court which promulgated them.' Alabama Public Serv. Comm'n v. Redwing Carriers, Inc., 281 Ala. 111, 115, 199 So. 2d 653, 656 (1967). 'We start with the basic premise that words used in court rules must be given their plain meaning.' Nieto v. State, 842 So. 2d 748, 749 (Ala. Crim. App. 2002). In construing a rule promulgated by this Court, effect must be given to 'each word, phrase, and clause.' State v. Old West Bonding Co., 203 Ariz. 468, 471, 56 P.3d 42, 45 (Ct. App. 2002)."

"'In Seaboard Surety Co. [v. William R. Phillips & Co., 279 Ala. 510, 187 So. 2d 264 (1966)], this court applied the general principles regarding the place where a cause of action arises as expressed in 92 C.J.S. Venue § 80, in determining the jurisdiction of the Bessemer Division. This court said:

"'"At 92 C.J.S. Venue § 80, p. 776, speaking of statutes fixing venue as the county 'where the cause of action arises' it is noted:

"'"'A cause of action, within the meaning of statutes fixing the venue as the county where the cause of action arises has been said to consist of a duty on the part of one toward another and the violation or breach of that duty, or of plaintiff's primary right and the act or omission of defendant.... It arises when that is not done which should have been done, or that is done which should not have been done.... he cause of action accrues in the county in which defendant's wrongful act was done.'

"'"Relating these general principles to the case at hand, it seems reasonable to us ... that ... the cause of action 'arose' within the meaning of the Bessemer Division Act within the Bessemer Division."