 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
People v. Harte11/17/2005
al sentence proposed by defendant merely called attention to specific points of evidence and argued conclusions to be drawn from that evidence. See People v. Inman, supra. In addition, the court permitted defendant's counsel to argue those conclusions in closing. See People v. Inman, supra.
We conclude that the instruction given by the trial court accurately stated defendant's theory and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by omitting the last sentence.
The judgment is affirmed.
JUDGE TAUBMAN and JUDGE PICCONE concur.
|