 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Temple v. Fence One12/15/2005
nce One owed her any duty of care in its installation of the Komars' fence.
{ } Because Temple's claims against Fence One fail as a matter of law, the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of Fence One.
Affirmed.
It is ordered that appellees recover of appellant costs herein taxed.
The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.
It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the Common Pleas Court to carry this judgment into execution.
A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
CHRISTINE T. McMONAGLE JUDGE
DIANE KARPINSKI, P.J., and KENNETH A. ROCCO, J., CONCUR.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Ohio Personal Injury Attorneys
Personal Injury Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|