 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Rabbit v. Mills8/22/2005
on to engraft on this statute a tolling period. As a result, there was no basis for the trial court to suspend the running of the statute of limitations and the limitations period expired on May 12, 2003.
Because the Rabbitts failed to revive their judgment within the ten-year statute of limitations, they are barred from enforcement of their judgment against Mills. The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the case remanded for any further proceedings as may be necessary.
Costs of appeal are assessed against Appellees.
|