 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Crook v. Jock7/13/2005
to accompany the Courtroom Deputy into an adjoining jury room and have discussions, with the goal being the pursuit of a settlement in this cause.
12. In the jury room, [counsel for Defendant] spoke with Mr. Crook and then exited the jury room and spoke to his client in the hallway in an attempt to resolve this matter.
13. At the time the settlement conference was concluded, a free and voluntary settlement of all issues then outstanding before the Court was reached. Mr. Crook and [counsel for Defendant] announced the settlement to the Court and the Court approved the settlement.
14. A proposed Agreement and Consent Order of Dismissal setting out the settlement in the cause was presented to the Court on January 12, 2004.
15. On January 12, 2004, Mr. Crook indicated to the Court that he no longer wished to go forward with the settlement. The Court inquired of Mr. Crook whether or not he had agreed to the contents of the proposed Agreement and Consent Order of Dismissal the previous week, and allowed Mr. Crook a full and complete opportunity to read the proposed Agreement and Consent Order of Dismissal and make any comments.
16. Thereafter, the Court went through the proposed Agreement and Consent Order of Dismissal line by line and inquired of Mr. Crook as to whether or not he agreed to the contents of same. Mr. Crook responded that he agreed to all of the provisions of the Agreement and Consent Order of Dismissal, after completing discussions with the Court.
17. After hearing of this matter on January 12, 200 , for the entry of the Agreement and Consent Order of Dismissal, the Court inquired as to whether or not anyone had forced Mr. Crook into this agreement. Mr. Crook responded that he had not been forced, but that he was a diabetic.
18. The Court inquired of Mr. Crook as to whether or not his physical condition rendered him unable to understand the nature and consequences of the agreements he reached on January 5, 2004. Mr. Crook replied that they did not do so.
In the Agreement and Consent Order of Dismissal, the parties purportedly agreed to the following:
1. This case will stand dismissed with the costs to be equally divided between the parties
2. The Court shall retain continuing jurisdiction over this matter for purposes of enforcing the terms and conditions of this Order.
3. The parties hereto agree that they shall not harm, molest, abuse, harass, annoy or come around one another from the date hereof.
4. The parties hereto agree that they shall maintain a distance of one thousand (1,000) yards from the residence and/or place of work of the other party.
5. The parties hereto agree that they will not contact or attempt to contact the other party, nor any of their past employers, present employers or future employers. They shall additionally refrain from contacting or attempting to contact the friends or family of the other party, pending further Orders of this Court.
6. The parties hereto agree that any information gathered in the course of this matter, whether by subpoena or otherwise, shall not be further disseminated to any entity for any purpose except for in response to a duly issued and served subpoena from a Court of competent jurisdiction.
7. The parties hereto agree that they mutually release one another from and against any and all claims, obligations, debts, causes of action, contracts, claims for personal injury or property damage, as well as any matter, fact or thing arising out of or in connection with any set of facts which occurred prior to the date of this Order. Each party shall hold t
Page 1 2 3 4 Tennessee Personal Injury Attorneys
Personal Injury Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|