 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Harmon v. Kroger5/25/2005
iculated specific factors that led it to discount appellant's credibility; those factors are supported by the record viewed in the light most favorable to appellee, and reasonable minds could have reached the same conclusion on the basis of those factors. See Daniels v. Arkansas Waffles, Inc., 83 Ark. App. 106, 117 S.W.3d 653 (2003). Consequently, we hold that the Commission did not arbitrarily disregard appellant's testimony.
Affirmed.
Gladwin and Bird, JJ., agree.
|