 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Carlson v. Friday4/26/2005
and disrupting other dogs at Hot Dogs. And she was prepared to muzzle Lucky if he showed signs of aggression and even seek veterinarian assistance if needed.
DECISION
Because appellant was "keeping" respondent's dogs for purposes of secondary ownership under Minn. Stat. ยง 347.22 (2004), the dog-bite statute, the district court did not err by granting respondent's motion for summary judgment.
Affirmed.
|