 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Murawski v. CNA Insurance Co.6/6/2005
that regard, principles of statutory construction require us to resolve that ambiguity in favor of Murawski. See, e.g., Botti v. CNA Ins. Co., 361 N.J. Super. 217, 224 (App. Div. 2003). Because I believe that Murawski is a named insured, I would not remand for a determination whether he is a resident of his mother's household and, therefore, covered by her auto insurance. Instead, I would enter judgment in favor of Murawski and allow him to recover full UIM benefits under Belafsky's insurance policy.
Justice Albin joins in this dissent.
Chief Justice Poritz PRESIDING
DISSENTING OPINION BY Justice Zazzali
|