 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Vlad v. Vlad4/29/2005
tate v. Vlad, 153 Ohio App.3d 74, 2003-Ohio-2930, at (a reviewing court "is permitted to review judgments only when it is presented with an order that is both final and appealable") (citation omitted). If an appellate court rules on the substantive merits of an issue, the court, by its ruling, has determined that the issue is ripe. Additionally, if an issue is not ripe for review, an appellate court cannot issue an advisory opinion, but rather must remand the issue to the lower court for further adjudication. Egan v. National Distillers & Chemical Corp. (1986), 25 Ohio St.3d 176, at syllabus (court would not consider issues neither raised nor justiciable as "it is well-settled that this court will not indulge in advisory opinions").
{ } For the reasons stated above, the decision of the Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division, should be affirmed.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Ohio Personal Injury Attorneys
Personal Injury Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|