 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
State v. Dillard3/28/2005
nding that was not set forth at the sentencing hearing. (August 29, 2003, Judgment Entry of Sentence, pp. 2-3.)
{ } As stated in the previous assignment of error, the trial court listed several reasons in support of its decision to impose the two maximum sentences at the sentencing hearing. The trial court's reference to Appellant's take-over attempt was limited. Thus, this error does not affect the validity of Appellant's sentencing. Appellant's sixth assignment of error is overruled.
{ } In conclusion, Appellant's assignments of error concerning the underlying offenses lack merit and his convictions are affirmed. However, the trial court erred in failing to make the requisite statutory findings accompanied by reasons supporting those findings, at Appellant's sentencing hearing concerning the imposition of consecutive sentences. Thus, Appellant's sentence is vacated, and this cause is hereby remanded to the trial court for resentencing according to law and consistent with this Court's Opinion.
Donofrio, P.J., concurs.
DeGenaro, J., concurs.
|