 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Estate of Allen v. Polly Ryon Hospital Authority3/3/2005
Appellant, Gloria Brown, filed health-care liability claims on behalf of the estate of Emzie Allen against appellees, Suklesh Dandona, M.D., and Polly Ryon Memorial Hospital (the hospital). Brown's appeal challenges orders by the trial court that dismissed her claims with prejudice on the grounds that her expert reports did not comply with the requirements of former article 4590i of the Medical Liability and Insurance Improvement Act (MLIIA). See Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat. Ann. art. 4590i, § 13.01(e), (r)(6) (Act of May 30, 1977, 65th Leg., R.S., ch. 817, §§ 1.01-12.01, 1977 Tex. Gen. Laws 2039-53, repealed by Act of June 2, 2003, 78th Leg., R.S., ch. 204 § 10.09, 2003 Tex. Gen. Laws 847, 884) (current version at Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 74.351(b)(2), (r)(6) (Vernon Supp. 2004-2005)). In two issues on appeal, Brown contends that the trial court abused its discretion by dismissing her entire medical-negligence case because (1) the reports represent a good-faith effort to provide a fair summary of the experts' opinions on the standard of care, breach of that standard, and causation of Allen's non-death related injuries and (2) certain of Brown's statutorily based claims are beyond the scope of article 4590i and are therefore exempt from its expert-report requirements. We affirm.
Background
Emzie Allen, an elderly male patient, was admitted from a nursing home to the hospital's acute-care center with a diagnosis of severe dehydration, acute renal failure, malnutrition, and urinary tract infection. After initial treatment, Allen was transferred to the hospital's skilled-nursing facility. He died 45 days after admission. Brown filed a wrongful-death and survival action on behalf of Allen's estate. Brown's pleadings allege that Allen received sub-standard medical and nursing care and treatment at the hospital and from Dr. Dandona, and that deficiencies in Allen's care resulted in several infections, decubitus ulcers, malnourishment, and, ultimately, Allen's death. Brown claimed that, but for the negligence of Dr. Dandona and the hospital, Allen would not have sustained these injuries. In addition to seeking damages for the estate's negligence claims, Brown's pleadings also alleged that Dr. Dandona and the hospital violated Allen's statutory patient's bill of rights and the Penal Code.
Brown filed two expert reports. The first contained the opinion of a physician, Jeannae Dergance, M.D., concerning the care provided to Allen by Dr. Dandona and the hospital; the second contained the opinion of a registered nurse, Linda McCall, R.N., concerning the care provided to Allen by the hospital. Dr. Dandona moved to dismiss Brown's lawsuit on the grounds that Dr. Dergance's report did not meet the statutory requirements of article 4590i, section 13.01(r)(6), because the report did not provide a fair summary of Dr. Dergance's opinions regarding the applicable standard of care for Allen's injuries and the causal relationship between the breach of this standard and his injuries. The hospital's motion to dismiss presented substantially the same arguments about Nurse McCall's report, but also asserted that her report was inadequate because it did not show that she was qualified to offer expert opinion. The trial court dismissed Brown's claims against Dandona with prejudice. In overruling Brown's motion for reconsideration, the trial court also dismissed her claims against the hospital with prejudice.
Standard of Review
We review article 4590i, section 13.01 rulings for abuse of discretion. Walker v. Gutierrez, 111 S.W.3d 56, 62 (Tex. 2003) (construing section 13.01(g)); Bowie Mem'l Hosp. v. Wright, 79 S.W.3d 48, 52 (Tex. 2002) (construing section 13.01 (l) an
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Texas Personal Injury Attorneys
Personal Injury Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
By using the system, you agree to TERMS OF SERVICE
|